That is a bit conspiratorial, backed by no evidence. Thus, your words have no credibility. Sara broke with The Linke, before the cracks were even visible, and she started from almost zero and doesn't seem to have much resources. That is not how "CIA" opperates.
That is a bit conspiratorial, backed by no evidence. Thus, your words have no credibility. Sara broke with The Linke, before the cracks were even visible, and she started from almost zero and doesn't seem to have much resources. That is not how "CIA" opperates.
BTW: "She started from almost zero": is a diversion.
1) Appearing to start from zero means nothing. Its an appearance for one. and for another this appearance often a method used to fake "outsiders".
Wagengknecht has been in fact...... married to a mega political insider Oskar LaFontaine....and is not some plucky outsider.
Secondly we live in a media culture. Media attention is currency. When the forces that want someone to get attention deliver her free advertising aka editorial coverage that is fawning as asks no hard questions about contradictions, this is delivering cash-free what every politician otherwise needs money for.
No person who has been in leadership of a major politcal party is an outsider. And claiming that the wife of such a person is "outsider" or has "nothing" is completely misleading. In plain english, this is what we call a ...lie.
Wagenknecht is not an outsider. She is part of the new breed of political lies, in which insiders are placed in various costumers of the "outsider", so as to capture those who would otherwise form REAL opposition. A sheep dog.
That's my assessment of the slippery way she is moving, and of the levers they seek to push. In this case it is very clear that they target the shifting forces of the swing vote and they set out trojan horses there.
Its not "conspiratorial". Its a quick and dirty distillation of the method being used. A method that you are oblivious to, but is clearly in use, when you look at the Green party.
Have you received the memo from Langley or Wash DC that B├жrbock is in their pocket? No.
Not waiting for the memo? Good luck There wont be one. Ever.
Use your eyes, and catch the clue, so you dont keep getting fooled.
That is a bit conspiratorial, backed by no evidence. Thus, your words have no credibility. Sara broke with The Linke, before the cracks were even visible, and she started from almost zero and doesn't seem to have much resources. That is not how "CIA" opperates.
BTW: "She started from almost zero": is a diversion.
1) Appearing to start from zero means nothing. Its an appearance for one. and for another this appearance often a method used to fake "outsiders".
Wagengknecht has been in fact...... married to a mega political insider Oskar LaFontaine....and is not some plucky outsider.
Secondly we live in a media culture. Media attention is currency. When the forces that want someone to get attention deliver her free advertising aka editorial coverage that is fawning as asks no hard questions about contradictions, this is delivering cash-free what every politician otherwise needs money for.
She has a consistent history outside of her hubby, who himself is at odds with the current SPD leadership...
No person who has been in leadership of a major politcal party is an outsider. And claiming that the wife of such a person is "outsider" or has "nothing" is completely misleading. In plain english, this is what we call a ...lie.
Wagenknecht is not an outsider. She is part of the new breed of political lies, in which insiders are placed in various costumers of the "outsider", so as to capture those who would otherwise form REAL opposition. A sheep dog.
That's my assessment of the slippery way she is moving, and of the levers they seek to push. In this case it is very clear that they target the shifting forces of the swing vote and they set out trojan horses there.
Its not "conspiratorial". Its a quick and dirty distillation of the method being used. A method that you are oblivious to, but is clearly in use, when you look at the Green party.
Have you received the memo from Langley or Wash DC that B├жrbock is in their pocket? No.
Not waiting for the memo? Good luck There wont be one. Ever.
Use your eyes, and catch the clue, so you dont keep getting fooled.
I'll keep an eye on it. But until evidence shows, I would take BSW over AfD every single time.
A sensible person would take NEITHER of two sets of charlatans.
This logic takes one outside the electoral system altogether.
That is fine with me, especially if random selection of representatives is pursued and the dissolution of political parties
Actually there are tens of million is of people in Germany and anyone can form a political park. So itтАЩs not a binary choice of two parties only.
Seems you who have have no logic at all.
You don't get it do you?
Have a read here: https://cooperism.law.columbia.edu/files/2023/09/B_On-the-Abolition-of-All-Political-Parties-Weil-copy.pdf
If one party can be corrupted, all parties, at limit could be corrupted (I mean the leadership in particular).
As such, randomly selecting representative members from qualified eligible citizens is the only long term solution to this issue.
You dont get it do you. I said you keep insisting there are only the two parties you keep marketing. But there are not.
And yes specific parties can be corrupt. It doesnt mean every party and person in the country is corrupted.
What you aim to do is funnel choice ONLY to two obviously ciorrupted parties. You are the problem.